Tag: Securus Technologies

  • AI-Enabled Surveillance, Attorney-Client Interference, and Retaliatory Digital Interference

    Pattern-or-Practice Civil Rights Violations in County Detention AI-Enabled Surveillance, Attorney-Client Interference, and Retaliatory Digital Interference Prepared by: LeRoy Nellis Austin, Texas United States Citizen Date: January 8, 2026 Recipients U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division (CRIPA) The Honorable Ron Wyden, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Committee on Commerce,…

  • Texas County Jails, Artificial Intelligence, and Ongoing Human Rights Violations

    NOTE: This is a live document and may change at any time. “What happened to me was not accidental, not coincidental, and not mental illness. It was the deliberate activation of a system—data-driven, AI-assisted, and enforced through custody.” — LeRoy Nellis POST–JANUARY 3, 2026: ONGOING VIOLATIONS AFTER TEXAS AI LAW TOOK EFFECT On January 1,…

  •    Williamson County Sheriff’s Office / NCIC / Securus — Domestic Black Site.

    Williamson County Jail Torture, Harassment, and Surveillance Program NOTE: This is a live document and may change at any time. “I personally endured these torture methods during my 336 days in solitary confinement. This isn’t metaphor—it’s lived reality. Every restraint, every humiliation, every hour of sensory deprivation was designed to erase me. But I refused…

  • If Williamson County Is Using NCIC/Securus to Hack, Steal, or Destroy Personal Data — How Can Any Evidence Survive Court?

    By LeRoy Nellis Let’s cut to the core issue the courts cannot dodge: If a law-enforcement agency participates in or benefits from unlawful digital intrusion, surveillance, or data manipulation, how can any evidence tied to that ecosystem be admissible in court? This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a constitutional and evidentiary problem. The Players in…