FCC Call Investigation Request: NCIC Impersonation and Unlawful Call Activity
FCC call investigation request filings are essential when patterns of suspicious or potentially unlawful telecommunications activity emerge. This complaint raises concerns about repeated automated calls, possible impersonation of government officials, and compliance issues involving NCIC-associated systems.
For broader investigative context, see the Master Timeline and the detention analysis.
Reference source document: :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
FCC Call Investigation Request — Filing Summary
This filing documents repeated call patterns, including zero-duration calls, automated dialing behavior, and representations of authority that may implicate federal telecommunications law. Additionally, it requests formal FCC review to determine compliance with applicable statutes and regulations.
Importantly, the request does not assert conclusions. Instead, it seeks independent regulatory analysis based on documented call activity.
To: consumercomplaints@fcc.gov
Cc: enforcement@fcc.gov; cyber@fbi.gov; ic3@fbi.gov; civilrights@usdoj.gov
Subject: Request for FCC Investigation – Potential Unlawful Call Activity and Government Impersonation Involving NCIC
Date: December 15, 2025
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to formally request that the Federal Communications Commission review and investigate a pattern of telephone call activity that raises serious concerns regarding potential violations of federal telecommunications law by NCIC (and/or entities operating systems associated with NCIC), including possible impersonation of state and federal officials.
This request is made in good faith and is based on documented call logs reflecting repeated inbound and outbound call attempts involving my telephone number (512-450-1533) over a defined period. I am not asserting conclusions; rather, I am asking the FCC to exercise its oversight authority to determine whether the conduct described below complies with applicable federal statutes and FCC regulations.
Summary of Concern
Over several weeks, my call logs show:
- Repeated calls from toll-free numbers (including 833 and 866 prefixes), many logged with zero-second duration
- Calls that appear automated or system-initiated
- Repeated call attempts clustered during weekday business hours
- Calls associated with institutional or government-adjacent identifiers, including numbers labeled as Washington, DC
- A pattern consistent with silent calls, line-verification activity, or automated dialing systems
In addition, during at least one call associated with these numbers, the caller represented themselves as a “special agent” and implied affiliation with a state or federal authority.
Impersonation Concern (Critical)
If accurate, such representations raise serious concerns regarding:
- Impersonation of federal or state officials
- Misrepresentation of authority in telecommunications
- Potential violations of FCC rules and related federal statutes governing caller identification, deception, and misuse of communications systems
I respectfully request that the FCC determine whether any party associated with NCIC or its calling systems has represented itself as a government agent without lawful authority, and whether such conduct violates FCC regulations or other federal law.
Numbers of Concern
- (866) 254-6555 – Toll Free (multiple zero-duration calls)
- (833) 319-1902 – Toll Free (mixed call durations)
- (833) 348-1802 – Toll Free
- (833) 341-0269 – Toll Free
- (202) 241-0073 – Washington, DC
- (301) 450-3616 – Silver Spring, MD
Complete call logs with timestamps and durations can be provided upon request.
Basis for FCC Review
- Compliance with 47 U.S.C. § 227 (TCPA)
- FCC rules on silent and automated calls
- Caller identification requirements
- Misrepresentation of authority
- Consent and lawful authorization
Request
- Review call activity
- Determine compliance
- Investigate impersonation
- Advise on further action
- Preserve records
Closing
Telecommunications providers operating in institutional contexts carry heightened responsibilities under federal law. Therefore, where patterns appear systematic or misleading, independent review is necessary.
Respectfully,
/s/ LeRoy Nellis
Why FCC Call Investigation Requests Matter
FCC call investigation requests help identify patterns that may otherwise go unexamined. Moreover, they provide a formal mechanism for regulatory oversight.
When call behavior appears automated, repetitive, or misleading, oversight agencies play a critical role. As a result, transparency and accountability depend on these filings.
For regulatory reference, see the FCC consumer protection guidance.