LeRoy Nellis

Contact

LEGAL PACKETDigital Retaliation, Evidence Tampering, and AI-Enabled Surveillance (Williamson County Sheriff’s Office, NCIC, Securus)



Submitted by:
LeRoy Nellis
4845 Twin Valley Dr.
Austin, Texas 78731
LeRoyNellis2@gmail.com
Date: January 5, 2026

COVER LETTER

TO:

U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530

Federal Communications Commission – Enforcement Bureau
45 L Street NE
Washington, DC 20554

Federal Trade Commission – Bureau of Consumer Protection
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20580

Texas Attorney General’s Office – Open Records Division
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711

RE: Request for Federal and State Investigation — Digital Retaliation, Evidence Tampering, and AI-Enabled Surveillance

Dear Federal and State Officials,

I respectfully submit this packet documenting a sustained pattern of digital retaliation, evidence manipulation, and AI-enabled surveillance involving government contractors and telecommunications vendors operating in coordination with the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office and related agencies.

The conduct described implicates federal criminal law, federal civil-rights law, telecommunications regulations, consumer-protection statutes, and Texas privacy and open-records law.

This submission is made in good faith, with supporting documentation, and after notice. Immediate preservation and coordinated review are requested.

Respectfully,

/s/ LeRoy Nellis
Austin, Texas

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Beginning in 2019, following a domestic-violence call that escalated into a full SWAT deployment and my entry into NCIC/TCIC databases, I have experienced a continuous and escalating pattern of:

  • Retaliatory surveillance
  • Digital interference
  • Evidence suppression
  • Mandatory AI-monitored communications
  • Unauthorized use of sealed records

This pattern spans pre-arrest, incarceration, and post-release periods and involves government actors and private vendors operating under monopoly control of communications infrastructure.

This packet demonstrates collapsed consent due to forced technology use, obstruction and spoliation after notice, retaliation for protected speech and whistleblowing, and enterprise-level coordination warranting RICO review.

II. TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS (2019–2026)

  • 2019: SWAT deployment (~50 officers); media dissemination prior to booking; NCIC/TCIC entry; mugshot later sealed.
  • 2020–2021: Persistent account access anomalies despite MFA; interference with legal materials.
  • 2022: Forced use of Securus/NCIC communications; all communications AI-monitored; no unmonitored alternatives.
  • 2023: Sealed 2019 mugshot reused to depict new arrest; dissemination via arrest sites and social media.
  • 2024: Deletion of online evidence; suppression of Texas Public Information Act responses.
  • 2025–2026: Recurring credential resets (~72-hour pattern); blog alterations; document disappearance.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Sealed Mugshot Misuse

A mugshot sealed by court order in 2019 was reused to depict a 2023 arrest and disseminated publicly. The lack of correction and rapid takedown indicates awareness of impropriety and raises spoliation and obstruction concerns.

B. AI Surveillance and Collapsed Consent

Securus and NCIC systems require biometric login and monitor all communications. Because no alternative exists, consent is coerced — implicating federal wiretap law, biometric statutes, and consumer-protection standards.

C. Digital Retaliation and Evidence Tampering

Repeated compromise of MFA-protected accounts, deletion of hosted materials, and alteration of records following protected speech indicate retaliation under color of law and unauthorized system access.

D. Telecommunications and Emergency Access Failures

NCIC-controlled systems lack functional 911 access, contrary to FCC public-safety mandates and raising ADA §504 concerns.

IV. LEGAL VIOLATIONS IMPLICATED (NON-EXHAUSTIVE)

Federal

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2511 — Wiretap Act
  • 18 U.S.C. § 2701 — Stored Communications Act
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1519 — Obstruction / Spoliation
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1030 — Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
  • 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil Rights
  • First, Sixth, Fourteenth Amendments
  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 — RICO

Telecom / Consumer

  • 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 201(b)
  • 47 C.F.R. Part 9 (E911)
  • FTC Act §5
  • ADA §504 / §508

Texas

  • Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §503 — Biometric Privacy
  • Texas DTPA
  • Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 552
  • Tex. Gov’t Code §552.352
  • Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 55.03

V. AGENCY-SPECIFIC REQUESTS

Department of Justice: Open civil-rights and criminal investigations; issue preservation orders; appoint independent forensic examiners; conduct enterprise (RICO) review.

Federal Communications Commission: Audit Securus/NCIC compliance; investigate E911 failures and unlawful monitoring.

Federal Trade Commission: Investigate coerced AI surveillance as unfair or deceptive practice.

Texas Attorney General: Enforce biometric-privacy laws; address sealed-record misuse; act on TPIA non-compliance.

VI. FORMAL DEMAND

  • Immediate evidence preservation
  • Coordinated federal and state investigations
  • RICO enterprise review
  • Written notice of investigative status

Failure to act will itself become part of the evidentiary record.

VII. CERTIFICATION

I, LeRoy Nellis, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

/s/ LeRoy Nellis
January 5, 2026

FINAL STATEMENT

Technology does not override the Constitution.
Artificial intelligence does not legalize coercion.
Silence after notice is not neutrality — it is exposure.

CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Comments

Leave a comment