DOJ OPR AI Surveillance Investigation Request Texas

Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI

DOJ OPR AI Surveillance Investigation Request Texas

DOJ OPR AI surveillance investigation request Texas is documented through a formal follow-up communication submitted to federal oversight authorities concerning a civil-rights complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. Based on documented correspondence, statutory references, and preserved submission content, this article establishes a structured evidentiary record. This constitutes a record derived from original communication and supporting documentation, presented without modification for transparency, accountability, and review.

DOJ OPR AI surveillance investigation request Texas federal oversight

DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility
DOJ Civil Rights Division – Special Litigation Section
Williamson County Master Timeline
LeRoy Nellis Blog Archive


DOJ OPR AI Surveillance Investigation Request Texas Overview

The following section preserves the original communication as an evidence layer. Therefore, no edits, summaries, or modifications have been made to the underlying document. This constitutes a record of submission as reflected in the source material.


DOJ OPR AI Surveillance Investigation Request Texas Evidence Record

My name is LeRoy Nellis II, and I am submitting this correspondence as a formal follow-up to a civil-rights complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division – Special Litigation Section, concerning violations that occurred during my detention at the Williamson County Jail in Georgetown, Texas (2024–2025).

This communication constitutes a formal request for internal review and investigation.

The attached filing documents that Williamson County Jail, operating under an Intergovernmental Service Agreement (IGSA) with the U.S. Marshals Service, has implemented AI-enabled surveillance systems that continuously record, analyze, and transmit detainee communications and behavioral data into federal systems, including NCIC, TCIC, and CJIS.

These activities are documented as occurring without judicial authorization and include the capture of attorney–client communications, raising substantial concerns regarding:

  • Privileged communications
  • Due process protections
  • Fourth Amendment privacy rights
  • Sixth Amendment right to counsel

Because these systems operate within a federal–local framework, this matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and federal oversight authorities.

Request for Investigation

  1. The scope and authorization of AI-enabled surveillance and data-collection systems under any Williamson County–U.S. Marshals Service IGSA agreements
  2. Whether any federal personnel, agents, or contractors accessed, reviewed, or utilized data collected through these systems
  3. Compliance with:
    • Federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2523)
    • CJIS Security Policy
    • Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)

Jurisdictional and Constitutional Scope

  • Fourth Amendment
  • Fifth Amendment
  • Sixth Amendment
  • Fourteenth Amendment

Accordingly, this matter constitutes a record of potential constitutional violations appropriate for federal civil-rights oversight and internal review.

Request for Acknowledgment

Please confirm receipt of this correspondence and provide any case number, reference ID, or tracking information associated with this request.

I am prepared to provide:

  • Supporting documentation
  • Affidavits
  • Technical analysis
  • Additional evidence upon request

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Respectfully,
LeRoy Nellis II
4845 Twin Valley Dr.
Austin, TX 78731
📧 leroynellis2@gmail.com
📞 512-450-1533

Attachment: DOJ Civil Rights Complaint — Williamson County Jail (Exhibits A–D)


Closing Record Statement

This document is presented as a structured record based on preserved correspondence and referenced federal complaint filings. It reflects the presence of communication, allegations, and requested actions without modification or interpretation.

This record is maintained for transparency, evidentiary continuity, and public reference. The current version supersedes prior versions and will be updated as additional responses, oversight actions, or official documentation become available.

Future updates will incorporate verified records, agency responses, and supplemental materials as they are obtained.

Discover more from LeRoy Nellis

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading